A Critique of Activity
Participation in Forensic Treatment Facilities
The article I chose to critique
dealt with forensics, a population I have not paid much attention to as of yet.
The research done had the purpose of measuring participation in activities in
forensic mental health facilities and its effects on the residents. Throughout
the course of this paper, I will outline the research done, pinpoint a few of
its strengths and weaknesses, and touch on implications that the research can
have on the field of therapeutic recreation.
Summary
Forensic mental health facilities
have the purpose of treating defendants who have been deemed unable to go to
trial so that they are able to eventually return to court and stand trial
competently. As such, decreasing the length of stay (LOS) of residents in
forensic mental health facilities is an area of interest to criminal systems
(Messina & Iwasaki, 2013). One way in which LOS can potentially be
decreased is through participation in therapeutic activity. The research in
this article compared the effects of both a voluntary, referral-based activity
program and a mandatory structured activity program on LOS and the level of
participation of residents.
In the voluntary program, residents
were free to choose the amount of time they spent in recreation as well as which
particular activities they participated in. This program was more individualized
and allowed for more freedom than the mandatory program. In this setting,
“higher total activity hours [were] predictive of greater participation”
(Messina & Iwasaki, 2013, p. 205). If the participants had freely chosen to
attend the activity, it was almost guaranteed that they would also participate
in the activity. In the mandatory structured program, there were general goals
for the residents as well as activities that were assigned to each building
(Messina & Iwasaki, 2013). The activities in this program were less
self-motivated but resulted in an increase in resident attendance as they were
required. In this setting it was found that, even if the residents were at
first reluctant to participate, they would eventually join in on activities and
participation would increase over time (Messina & Iwasaki, 2013). In both
the voluntary and mandatory settings studied, the LOS was decreased and
competency levels were increased when activity participation was increased.
Strengths
The researchers conducting this
project had an impressive knowledge of how to use statistics, which they put to
good use in obtaining data. Without this knowledge, the research would have
been much more difficult because other, less quantitative methods of obtaining
data would have had to be used. In addition, the researchers fully disclosed
any limitations that they noticed in their research, which was quite
refreshing. They did not try to hide it behind statistics or interesting
outcomes of the research. Another strength was that the sample population was
fairly representative of typical forensic populations, which makes the research
more accurate and applicable in the area of forensics.
Weaknesses
One of the main weaknesses of this
research was the fact that the statistical data that was obtained and analyzed
was secondary data. While this data was useful, it would have been more
accurate if at least some of this secondary data was supplemented by primary
data from the residents. In addition to this, because so many numbers were used
in the statistical analysis, there exists the possibility that some of the
information may have been entered into the database incorrectly. This may have
caused some of the data and the results drawn from it to be inaccurate. Another
concern in the research method was that there were other treatments in addition
to the activities that were studied in the research, ranging from medication to
other therapies to trainings that could have impacted for the LOS of the
participants and were not accounted for. Utilizing a control group that did not
participate in the activities studied would have been beneficial because it
could lessen the impact of this.
Implications
The finding that LOS can be
decreased for residents of forensic mental health facilities whether the
program is voluntary or mandatory can have several implication for the field of
therapeutic recreation. Perhaps the most obvious implication is that these
results have the possibility to increase the focus that is placed on
therapeutic activity programs in forensics as well as motivate such facilities
to improve the quality of such programs. Additional research could be done in
comparing the LOS and competency for participants in voluntary programs to
those in mandatory programs. This could help facilities determine which type of
program they should utilize in achieving their goals of increasing competency
and decreasing LOS.
Personal Reaction
I had never considered the purpose
or impact of the therapeutic recreation process in the area of forensics until
our class watched the movie One Flew over
the Cuckoo’s Nest. I had simply not considered the quality or need for
activity programs in such locations. Reading this article showed me that this
is a population that is often neglected, as not much research has been done
regarding activity programs in forensics. This article expanded my view of the
impact that therapeutic recreation can have across a variety of settings and
populations.
Conclusion
While the research method used in
this article could use a few improvements, it has potential for benefiting both
the therapeutic recreation process in forensics correction facilities as well
as the lives and competencies of those who are treated there. The main purpose
of the research, namely finding how activity participation affected the
competency and LOS of the residents, was achieved. Improvements in LOS and
competency of the residents was shown to be correlated with the purposeful
activity that was incorporated into the participants’ lives. Further research
could be done in different correctional forensics locations to further
establish the findings presented in this article.
References
Messina,
E., & Iwasaki, Y. (2013). Analysis of participation levels in activity
programming at a correctional mental health facility. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 47(3), 197-211.
No comments:
Post a Comment